Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) is a cornerstone of modern business communication, connecting organizations worldwide and enabling seamless data exchange. Strangely enough, there are parallels between the evolution of EDI and the development of languages like English and Sanskrit. In this blog post, we'll explore how EDI, like English, has network effects and standardizes, while contrasting it with Sanskrit, which did not experience the same kind of network effects.
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) is a standardized format for exchanging business data electronically. It enables the transfer of documents, such as purchase orders and invoices, between organizations, streamlining processes and reducing manual intervention. Like a language, EDI becomes more powerful as more parties adopt it.
Network effects occur when the value of a product or service increases as more people use it. In the case of EDI, network effects are evident in several ways:
The English language serves as an excellent example of network effects stemming from historical factors, such as colonization and globalization. The widespread use of English has created a global network effect, where it has become the de facto language for international business, diplomacy, and culture.
The expansion of the British Empire and later globalization efforts, such as the spread of American culture and technology, contributed to the global adoption of English. As more people around the world learned and used English, its value as a lingua franca grew. Today, English is the most widely spoken second language and is often used for international business communication.
In contrast to English and EDI, Sanskrit did not experience the same kind of network effects. Despite being a classical language with a rich literary tradition, Sanskrit did not evolve into a global lingua franca. Why?
EDI, much like the English language, benefits from network effects and standardization. As more organizations embrace EDI standards, the efficiency and value of this electronic language increase. Conversely, languages like Sanskrit, which did not experience the same network effects or standardization, remained confined to specific regions and purposes.
Understanding these parallels helps us appreciate how network effects can shape the adoption and standardization of technologies and languages, ultimately influencing the way we communicate and conduct business on a global scale.